Here’s a thought experiment. Suppose you share an apartment building with someone whose job keeps them working late, leaving their two sons home alone. "Jean-Jacques" (played by Félix Lefebvre) is older, while "Sofiane" (Alex Tonetti) has a fondness for late-night snacks like chips or fries. After one incident involving hot oil—requiring his brother to take him to the hospital in a shopping cart—and intervention from authorities suggesting he might be better off in care, what would your reaction be? Setting aside questions of parental responsibility, consider the potential danger to other residents who could find themselves waking up amidst damaged property, or worse. The returning mother, "Sylvie" (Virginie Efira), seems indifferent to their concerns; as events unfold, she appears largely unconcerned with anyone's well-being, her focus entirely on regaining custody of her young son, “Froggy.” I found myself wondering if the boy might actually be safer and we all a bit more secure at night! This realization highlighted just how simplistic the narrative felt. The film seems intent on eliciting sympathy for "Sylvie" and portraying the system as harsh, understaffed, and seemingly uninterested in the welfare of young “Sofiane.” I dislike feeling manipulated by a movie, and despite genuinely strong performances from Efira, Arieh Worthalter as the estranged father "Hervé," and Lefebvre as the other son, the entire film felt like an injustice to dedicated professionals struggling to cope with limited resources and recognition. It does offer some insight into the intense bond between a mother and her young son, but it depends too heavily on that inherent emotional response from viewers and fails to develop the characters beyond their immediate, reactive behaviors, preventing them from earning our trust. There are superior films that explore this situation more thoroughly, and the film’s unrealistic ending pretty much encapsulated its shortcomings.

Source on TMDB