W2TCH

A Hidden Life (2019)

2019 • 2h 53m • Drama, History • PG-13
On September 25, 2026
#4095▲ 2750
4095th by Pulse movie online
44.9PULSEPulse MeterOur daily Pulse Meter measures public activity and popularity signals across the web.How it works →

All reviews

Matthew Brady on A Hidden Life

7/10 · Jan 27, 2020

"If God gives us free will, we are responsible for what we do or what we fail to do." Ambitious, yet surprisingly straightforward. It’s a genuine and impactful story presented in a very distinct style reminiscent of Terrance Malick. ‘A Hidden Life,’ based on letters from Austria during the early years of Hitler's rule, portrays a husband and wife who oppose the Nazi party—a decision that unfortunately results in the husband’s imprisonment and his wife facing persecution from villagers, long-time friends and neighbors who suddenly become adversaries. The camera work and cinematography were exceptional, as one would expect with a Terrance Malick film. The camera moves freely, often circling the actors and looming over their lives—sometimes getting very close. Everyone delivers powerful performances because Malick allows the actors to work spontaneously, encouraging them to be present in the moment. This lets us experience Franz and his wife Franziska (and their children) living fully in the present, showcasing how beautifully poetic life can be before the horrors of war destroy everything and make us appreciate the small things we often take for granted. Apparently, whenever an actor seemed unsure on camera, Malick would gently nudge them forward, encouraging them to continue with their actions and discover new aspects while seemingly losing themselves in character. I believe this is why the actors deliver such raw and natural performances; it probably also helps them connect deeply with their characters since they can’t really go wrong. While it didn't necessarily need to run for three hours, and could have been trimmed down to around two, I had some difficulty with how long the film remained in one location, which slowed down the pace. I must admit there was a point where I almost fell asleep, not because it was boring, but because I’d already had a very draining day, and the movie didn't always help. However, about midway through, the film managed to re-engage me, which is quite rare for an art house movie. I have to give Malick credit; no one makes films exactly like him. Whether you enjoy his work or not, no other director has come close to capturing the connection between humanity and nature that he does. It’s easy to dismiss his movies as “pretentious.” His narrative style is quite disjointed, but it feels more honest than typical movie dialogue because we rarely say what we truly mean; it's often a rambling mess. I frequently find that those who criticize him and claim to know about ‘keeping it real’ are actually the pretentious ones. What’s unique about this film and his previous work is that when it ends, you begin to notice nature—really notice it—something you might not have done before. Things like grass and leaves swaying in the wind, natural light, the warmth of the sun on your skin, and the scent of the outdoors. It's remarkable how a movie can reawaken senses I haven’t experienced in a long time, dating back to my childhood. “Nostalgia is a powerful feeling; it can drown out anything.” Overall rating: A gratifying return to form.

Source on TMDB